Ocorrência de eventos adversos após o uso da vacina adsorvida difteria, tétano e pertussis (acelular) - dTpa -, São Paulo, SP, 2015-2016 / Aparecimiento de eventos adversos después del uso de la vacuna adsorbida difteria, tétanos y tosferina (acelular) - dTpa -, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 2015-2016 / Adverse event occurrence following use of tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis adsorbed vaccine - Tdap -, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2015-2016

Objetivo: descrever a ocorrência de eventos adversos pós-vacinação (EAPV) com a vacina dTpa durante a gestação. Métodos: estudo descritivo, com dados de relatos das participantes de estudo de efetividade e imunogenicidade realizado em dois hospitais de São Paulo, SP, Brasil, entre 2015 e 2016. Resultados: das 201 mães incluídas no estudo, 48 (23,9%) apresentaram pelo menos um EAPV; foram identificados 60 sintomas relacionados ao uso da dTpa - dor (22,4%), inchaço (2,5%), febre (1,5%), sono (1,0%), vermelhidão (0,5%), vômito (0,5%), dor de cabeça (0,5%), reação local (0,5%) e cansaço (0,5%); não foram registrados eventos adversos raros, muito raros ou extremamente raros; todos os eventos foram considerados esperados e estão descritos em bula; todos tiveram desfecho para cura sem sequelas. Conclusão: a dTpa, na forma adotada pelo Programa Nacional de Imunizações (PNI), é segura; não foram identificados eventos adversos inesperados entre as gestantes imunizadas com a vacina.

Objetivo: describir el aparecimiento de eventos adversos posvacunación (EAPV) con la vacuna dTpa durante el embarazo. Métodos: estudio descriptivo con datos de relatos de las participantes del estudio de efectividad e inmunogenicidad realizado en dos hospitales de São Paulo, SP, Brasil, entre 2015 y 2106. Resultados: de las 201 madres del estudio, 48 (23,9%) tuvieron al menos un EAPV; se identificaron 60 síntomas relacionados al uso de dTpa - dolor (22.4%), hinchazón (2.5%), fiebre (1.5%), somnolencia (1.0%), enrojecimiento (0.5%), vómitos (0.5 %), dolor de cabeza (0.5%), reacción local (0.5%) y cansancio (0.5%) -; no se informaron eventos adversos raros, muy raros o extremadamente raros; todos los eventos se consideraron esperados y se describen en el prospecto; todos tuvieron resultados curativos sin secuelas. Conclusión: el estudio mostró que la vacuna dTpa utilizada por el Programa Nacional de Inmunización (PNI) es segura y no se identificaron eventos adversos inesperados entre las mujeres embarazadas vacunadas.

Objective: to describe occurrence of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. Methods: this was a descriptive study using data from reports by participants in an effectiveness and immunogenicity study conducted in two hospitals in São Paulo, SP, Brazil, from 2015 to 2016. Results: of the 201 mothers included in the study, 48 (23.9%) had at least one AEFI; 60 symptoms related to Tdap use were identified - pain (22.4%), swelling (2.5%), fever (1.5%), somnolence (1.0%), redness (0.5%), vomiting (0.5%), headache (0.5%), local reaction (0.5%), and fatigue (0.5%); no rare, very rare, or extremely rare adverse events were reported; all events were considered to be expected, as they are described in the vaccine package insert; outcome of all events was recovery without sequelae. Conclusion: Tdap vaccine in the form adopted by the National Immunization Program is safe; no unexpected adverse events were identified among vaccinated pregnant women.

Protocolo del Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de enfermedades inmunoprevenibles. No. 06 / Protocol of the National Epidemiological Surveillance System of immunoprevenible diseases. No. 06

Estos protocolos están dirigido a personal médico, paramédico y otros profesionales que realizan acciones gerenciales y operativas de vigilancia epidemiológica en los servicios de salud del país, y están divididos en varios tomos para dar a conocer y actualizar la identificación y medidas de control para diversos padecimientos a fin de continuar con el mejoramiento de las capacidades técnicas de los trabajadores de salud, que permita planificar la prestación de servicios con decisiones partiendo de un enfoque epidemiológico comprobado, para responder a los cambios de tendencias epidemiológicas y con ello contribuir al fortalecimiento de prácticas asertivas de la salud pública de nuestro país. La vigilancia epidemiológica de las enfermedades prevenibles con vacuna, busca reducir la mortalidad y morbilidad por infecciones inmunoprevenibles. La vigilancia epidemiológica, es fundamental para evaluar el impacto de las intervenciones y la toma de decisiones de acuerdo al análisis permanente de la situación de salud.

Validación de un ensayo inmunoenzimático tipo ELISA para cuantificar niveles de antitoxina diftérica en suero humano / Validation of an ELISA-type immune-enzymatic test to quantify levels of diphtheria antitoxin in human serum

Introducción: La difteria aún persiste en numerosos países. En Cuba, estudios realizados en diferentes grupos etarios han demostrado que existen niveles no protectores de antitoxina diftérica en la población, por lo que es necesario contar con métodos que permitan la estimación serológica de la inmunidad poblacional. La cuantificación de anticuerpos contra antígenos vacunales como la toxina diftérica es además un método útil, rápido y económico para evaluar la respuesta inmune. Objetivo: Validar un ensayo inmunoenzimático tipo ELISA para cuantificar los niveles de antitoxina diftérica en suero humano. Material y Método: Se realizó un estudio experimental de desarrollo tecnológico, en el cual se determinaron los valores óptimos de las variables que influyen en el resultado de un ensayo inmunoenzimático heterogéneo indirecto para la cuantificación de antitoxina diftérica, desarrollado en el laboratorio de Inmunología del Centro Nacional de Genética Médica de Cuba. La curva de calibración se evaluó contra el estándar de la OMS (Diphtheria Antitoxin Human Serum 00/496). Se realizó la validación analítica del método estandarizado. Resultados: Los coeficientes de variación intraensayo e interensayo fueron inferiores a 10 por ciento y 20 por ciento, respectivamente. En la exactitud y selectividad se encontraron valores de recobrado entre 90 y 110 por ciento. El paralelismo entre la curva estándar y las muestras estudiadas presentó un coeficiente de variación menor o igual a 10 por ciento. El límite de cuantificación fue 0,015 UI/mL y el de detección 0,0039 UI/mL. Conclusiones: El resultado obtenido en la precisión, exactitud y selectividad del ensayo inmunoenzimático tipo ELISA desarrollado demostró que puede ser utilizado en la práctica clínica para cuantificar los valores de antitoxina diftérica en suero humano(AU)

Introduction: Diphtheria still persists in many countries. In Cuba, studies conducted in different age groups have demonstrated that there are non-protective levels of diphtheria antitoxin in the population, so it is necessary to have methods that allow the serologic survey of population immunity. The quantification of antibodies against vaccine antigens such as diphtheria toxin is also a useful, rapid and economic method to evaluate the immune response. Objective: To validate an ELISA-type immune-enzymatic test to quantify the levels of diphtheria antitoxin in human serum. Material and Method: An experimental study of technological development was carried out in the Immunology Laboratory of the National Medical Genetics Center, Havana, Cuba. The optimal values ​​of the variables that influence on the result of the indirect heterogeneous immune-enzymatic test for the quantification of diphtheria antitoxin were determined. The calibration curve obtained was evaluated against the WHO standard (Diphtheria Antitoxin Human Serum 00/496). The analytical validation of the standardized method was performed. Results: The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were less than 10 percent and 20 percent, respectively. Recovery values ​​between 90 and 110% were found in accuracy and selectivity. The parallelism between the standard curve and the samples studied showed a coefficient of variation lower or equal to 10 percent. The limit of quantification was 0,015 IU/mL and the one of detection was 0,0039 IU/mL. Conclusions: The result obtained in the precision, accuracy and selectivity of the ELISA-type immune-enzymatic test developed and validated in the National Medical Genetics Center demonstrated that it can be used in the clinical practice to quantify the values ​​of diphtheria antitoxin in human serum(AU)

A Review of Traditional Vaccine-Preventable Diseases and the Potential Impact on the Otolaryngologist

Abstract Introduction A majority of otolaryngologists have not had direct experience with many vaccine-preventable diseases since the creation of national vaccination programs. Despite the elimination of endemic transmission of some of these diseases in the United States, outbreaks can occur anywhere and still pose a threat to public health around the world. Recent outbreaks and changing trends in exemption rates indicate that it is important for physicians to maintain a working knowledge of how these diseases present and of the recommended treatment guidelines. Objectives This review will evaluate the current state of vaccination rates, vaccine exemption rates and disease incidence in the United States and in the world. It will also examine the clinical presentation and treatment recommendations of these diseases. Data Synthesis United States estimated vaccination rates, vaccine exemption rates and vaccine-preventable disease incidences were obtained from data compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. World vaccination rates and disease incidences were obtained from the World Health Organization databases, which compile official figures reported by member states. A PubMed literature review provided information on the current state of vaccination exemptions and outbreaks in the United States. Conclusion Vaccination and vaccine exemption rates continue to put the United States and many areas of the world at risk for outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Clinical guidelines should be reviewed in the event of a local outbreak.

Diphtheria vaccination campaign in Yemen

The WHO, national authorities and partners have recently completed a largescale vaccination campaign in response to the ongoing diphtheria outbreak in Yemen. More than 6000 health workers were mobilized during the campaign

What is the importance of vaccine hesitancy in the drop of vaccination coverage in Brazil? / Qual a importância da hesitação vacinal na queda das coberturas vacinais no Brasil?

ABSTRACT The successful Programa Nacional de Imunizações do Brasil (Brazilian National Immunization Program) has been experiencing a major challenge with regard to vaccination coverage for children, which has been dropping. Several aspects are related, but certainly vaccine hesitancy has been strengthening itself as one of the main concerns of Brazilian public administrators and researchers. Vaccine hesitancy is the delay in acceptance or refusal despite having the recommended vaccines available in health services, being a phenomenon that varies over time, over location and over types of vaccines. Hesitant individuals are between the two poles of total acceptance and refusal of vaccination. Vaccine hesitancy is nothing new in European and North-American countries, and even in Brazil, it has been studied even if under another name. The drop of vaccination coverage observed from 2016 on reiterates the relevance of the theme, which must be better understood through scientific research.

RESUMO O exitoso Programa Nacional de Imunizações do Brasil tem vivenciado grande desafio com relação às coberturas vacinais infantis, que têm apresentado queda. Diversos aspectos estão relacionados, mas certamente a hesitação vacinal vem se fortalecendo como uma das principais preocupações dos gestores e pesquisadores brasileiros. Hesitação vacinal é o atraso em aceitar ou a recusa das vacinas recomendadas quando elas estão disponíveis nos serviços de saúde, sendo um fenômeno que varia ao longo do tempo, do local e dos tipos de vacinas. Indivíduos hesitantes situam-se entre os dois polos de aceitação e recusa total da vacinação. A hesitação vacinal não é novidade em países europeus e norte-americanos e, mesmo no Brasil, ela já vem sendo estudada ainda que sob outra denominação. A queda das coberturas vacinais observadas a partir de 2016 reitera a relevância do tema, que deve ser mais bem compreendido por meio de investigações científicas.

Informe especial: Actualización epidemiológica de difteria / Special report: Epidemiological update of diphtheria

La difteria es una enfermedad infecciosa grave, con potencial epidémico, para la que existe una vacuna eficaz. Es una infección bacteriana aguda causada por la liberación de una exotoxina específica, producida por el bacilo gram positivo, Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Sólo las cepas toxigénicas causan enfermedad. La enfermedad se presenta principalmente en menores de 15 años de edad sin vacunación o con vacunación incompleta; no obstante puede presentarse en adultos en áreas con baja cobertura de vacunación. En este informe se presentan distintos aspectos de la enfermedad y la situación epidemiológica en las Américas y en Argentina: definiciones de caso, medidas de prevención y de control

Diphtheria in the Dominican Republic: reduction of cases following a large outbreak / Difteria en la República Dominicana: reducción de casos tras un extenso brote epidémico

OBJECTIVE: To describe the most recent outbreak of diphtheria in the Dominican Republic and the disease's occurrence and vaccination coverage in 2004-2013. METHODS: Clinical data of diphtheria cases that occurred in 2004 and that met the study's case definition were reviewed along with socioeconomic and epidemiological information from the cases' families. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess risk factors for fatal diphtheria. Routine surveillance and vaccination coverage data are presented. RESULTS: From January 2004-April 2005, a total of 145 diphtheria cases were reported; 80 (66%) of the 122 cases reported in 2004 met the case definition; 26 were fatal (case-fatality rate: 32.5%). Incidence was highest in the group 1-4 years of age at 5.3 per 100 000; 62.5% were male. Of the 80 cases, 61 (76%) where hospitalized in Hospital A, 17 in Hospital B, and 2 in two other hospitals. Earlier onset (first half of 2004), birth order, and tracheotomy were associated with fatal diphtheria (P < 0.05); cases in Hospital A were also more likely to be fatal (P = 0.066). The average annual diphtheria incidence was 4.91 cases/1 million people in 2000-2003, climbed to 8.8 cases per million in 2004-2005, and dropped to 0.38 in 2006-2014; no diphtheria cases have been reported since 2011. DTP3 vaccination coverage ranged from 72%-81% in 2000-2004 and from 81%-89% in 2005-2013. CONCLUSIONS: The 2004-2005 diphtheria outbreak in the Dominican Republic resulted in important and avoidable morbidity and mortality. Annual cases declined and no cases have been reported in recent years. Maintaining high vaccination coverage and diligent surveillance are crucial to preventing diphtheria outbreaks and controlling the disease.

OBJETIVO: Describir el brote epidémico más reciente de difteria en la República Dominicana, la incidencia de la enfermedad y la cobertura de la vacunación del 2004 al 2013. MÉTODOS: Se analizaron los datos clínicos de los casos de difteria acaecidos en el 2004 y que cumplieron con la definición de caso del estudio, junto con la información socioeconómica y epidemiológica de las familias en las que aparecieron los casos. Se llevaron a cabo análisis de una sola variable y de múltiples variables para evaluar los factores de riesgo de difteria mortal. Se presentan los datos de vigilancia ordinaria y cobertura vacunal. RESULTADOS: De enero del 2004 a abril del 2005, se notificaron un total de 145 casos de difteria; 80 (66%) de los 122 casos notificados en el 2004 cumplieron con la definición de caso; 26 fueron mortales (tasa de letalidad por caso: 32,5%). La incidencia más alta (5,3 por 100 000) se produjo en el grupo de 1 a 4 años de edad; 62,5% fueron varones. De los 80 casos, 61 (76%) se hospitalizaron en el Hospital A, 17 en el Hospital B, y 2 en otros dos hospitales. La aparición más temprana (primera mitad del 2004), el orden de nacimiento y la traqueotomía se asociaron con difteria mortal (P < 0 ,05); la probabilidad de evolución mortal fue mayor en los casos ingresados en el Hospital A (P = 0,066). La incidencia promedio anual de difteria fue de 4,91 casos por millón de personas del 2000 al 2003, ascendió a 8,8 casos por millón durante los años 2004 y 2005, y descendió a 0,38 del 2006 al 2014; no se han notificado casos de difteria desde el 2011. La cobertura de la vacunación con DTP3 varió de 72 a 81% del 2000 al 2004 y de 81 a 89% del 2005 al 2013. CONCLUSIONES: El brote epidémico de difteria de los años 2004 y 2005 en la República Dominicana ocasionó una importante morbimortalidad prevenible. Se produjo un descenso en la incidencia de casos y no se han notificado nuevos casos en los últimos años. El mantenimiento de una alta cobertura vacunal y de una vigilancia eficiente es crucial para la prevención de los brotes epidémicos de difteria y el control de la enfermedad.

Study of Immunization Status and Outcome of Diphtheria Patients.

Background: With advent of EPI and UIP, most of the vaccine preventable diseases have shown a decline; however, Diphtheria continues to remain an endemic disease and has also shown resurgence nationally as well as internationally. Aims and Objectives: To study Diphtheria morbidity and mortality trends. To note variation with respect to age, sex, immunization status, seasonal variation and outcome. Materials and Method: A retrospective analysis of hospital records over the period of 3 years from Jan/2008 to Dec/2010 obtained with permission of hospital superintendent Dr. Jhala from infectious disease hospital in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. Details of 247 cases regarding age, sex, immunization status were taken as per the hospital case records. Results: Of 247 cases, 114 were male (46%), 133 (54%) Females, 71 (29%) were under 5 Years, 103 (42%) were in 6 – 12 years and 35 (14%) were in 13- 20yrs, 38 patients (15%) were noted within 21-60yrs group, a total of 73 (29.5%) patients were observed in adult and adolescent group. Mortality was 0.47%. Incidence was more in months of September to March. In the present study, 85 (34.4%) were completely immunized, 31 (12.55%) were partially immunized and for 18 (7.3%) vaccination status was unknown. 113 (45.75%) were not immunized. Conclusion: Diphtheria continues to remain a major public health concern in spite of being a vaccine preventable disease, though common in pediatric age it is increasingly common in adoloscent and adults. High level of clinical suspicion needed to keep the mortality rates on lower side. A strict implementation of vaccination programmes with follow up booster dose is necessary which will increase the herd immunity, leading to decrease in diphtheria prevalence.

Factors Associated with Vaccination among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients in Korea / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Vaccinations are generally recommended in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, several studies showed low rates of vaccinations in IBD patients. Furthermore, vaccination rate among IBD patients in Korea has never been investigated. We investigated the vaccination rate among IBD patients in Korea and evaluated some factors that might affect the vaccination rate. METHODS: From November 2011 to February 2012, a total of 192 patients with IBD who visited Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) answered the IRB-approved questionnaire. The questionnaire included their sex, age, residence, past medical history, type of IBD, duration of illness, medications, history of vaccination about measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), varicella, tetanus-diphtheria (Td), influenza, hepatitis A and B, pneumococcus and human papilloma virus (HPV). RESULTS: One hundred twenty one (63.0%) male and 71 (37.0%) female answered the questionnaire. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 39.7 (18-76) years. Eighty four patients (43.8%) had ulcerative colitis and 108 patients (56.3%) had Crohn's disease (CD). The percentage of the patients who had got vaccination was 42.2% for MMR, 34.9% for varicella, 15.6% for Td, 37.5% for influenza, 15.6% for hepatitis A, 52.6% for hepatitis B, 6.3% for pneumococcus and 11.3% for HPV respectively. Not knowing the necessity or the existence were the common reasons for non-vaccination. Age less than 40 years, CD patients and duration of illness less than 10 years were associated with a higher vaccination rate (p=0.002, 0.015 and 0.020, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Immunization rates for recommended vaccinations were very low in patients with IBD. Efforts to improve vaccination rate are needed.

Evaluation of Immunogenicity and Safety of the New Tetanus-Reduced Diphtheria (Td) Vaccines (GC1107) in Healthy Korean Adolescents: A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial

This phase II clinical trial was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a newly developed tetanus-reduced diphtheria (Td) vaccine (GC1107-T5.0 and GC1107-T7.5) and control vaccine. This study was also performed to select the proper dose of tetanus toxoid in the new Td vaccines. Healthy adolescents aged between 11 and 12 yr participated in this study. A total of 130 subjects (44 GC1107-T5.0, 42 GC1107-T7.5 and 44 control vaccine) completed a single dose of vaccination. Blood samples were collected from the subjects before and 4 weeks after the vaccination. In this study, all subjects (100%) in both GC1107-T5.0 and GC1107-T7.5 groups showed seroprotective antibody levels (> or = 0.1 U/mL) against diphtheria or tetanus toxoids. After the vaccination, the geometric mean titer (GMT) against diphtheria was significantly higher in Group GC1107-T5.0 (6.53) and GC1107-T7.5 (6.11) than in the control group (3.96). The GMT against tetanus was 18.6 in Group GC1107-T5.0, 19.94 in GC1107-T7.5 and 19.01 in the control group after the vaccination. In this study, the rates of local adverse reactions were 67.3% and 59.1% in GC1107-T5.0 and GC1107-7.5, respectively. No significant differences in the number of adverse reactions, prevalence and degree of severity of the solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions were observed among the three groups. Thus, both newly developed Td vaccines appear to be safe and show good immunogenicity. GC1107-T5.0, which contains relatively small amounts of tetanus toxoid, has been selected for a phase III clinical trial.

Modifica decreto Nº 6, de 2010, que dispone vacunación obligatoria contra enfermedades inmunoprevenibles de la población del país / Amending Decree No. 6 of 2010, which provides compulsory vaccination against preventable diseases of the country's population

Modifícase el decreto Nº6, de 2010, del Ministerio de Salud, que dispone la vacunación obligatoria de la población contra las enfermedades inmunoprevenibles que se indican, reemplazando en su punto Nº 1, los numerales 3, 4, 5 y 11, respectivamente, en la forma que se indica.

Diphtheria in Pakistan

Over the last three weeks in Pakistan, 19 suspected cases of diphtheria, including 6 deaths were reported. Of these, 15 cases including 5 deaths were reported from seven districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa [KPK] province while 5 cases including 1 death were reported from one district in Sindh province. The age of cases ranged between 10 months to 10 years, half of the cases were over 6 years. The reported cases did not have any history of vaccination against DPT. No case has yet been laboratoryconfirmed. Based on clinical diagnosis, appropriate public health measures like case management, contact tracing and prophylactic treatment of the close contacts have been initiated to contain the spread of the disease

Immunogenicity and Safety of Diphtheria-tetanus Vaccine in Adults

This study was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of diphtheria-tetanus (Td) vaccine in adults over 40 yr old who had never received a diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccination. A total of 242 subject completed three-doses of Td vaccination and subsequent assays for immunogenicity. Before vaccination, 33.9% and 96.7% participants showed antibody levels of diphtheria and tetanus, respectively, which were below protective level ( or =0.1 U/mL) for diphtheria and tetanus, with an increase to 99.6% and 100% after the third dose. Local and systemic adverse events occurred in 37.9% and 15.5% of the subjects. No serious adverse event requiring an unscheduled hospital visit occurred. In conclusion, three-doses of Td vaccination to unimmunized adults are safe and effective in inducing protective immunity against diphtheria and tetanus.

Reacciones adversas a vacuna DPT del Programa Nacional de Inmunizaciones / Adverse reactions to diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine in the Chilean Immunization Program

Background: During 2005, the surveillance system of the Chilean Immunization Program detected an increased number of adverse reaction notifications associated to diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus whole-cell vaccine (DPT), coincidentiy with a change in the vaccine manufacturer. Aim: To compare the reactogenicity of two DPT formulations (vaccines 1 and 2) in 18-month-old infants and 4-year-old children. Material and methods: Severe adverse reactions to DPT were studied at the emergency room of two hospitals of Santiago in a case-control study (110 cases and 171 controls, who consulted for other causes). Simultaneously the incidence of total adverse reactions (mild and severe) for vaccine 1 and 2 was estimated in a cohort of 1,017 children vaccinated in an ambulatory health center of the same área. The formulation of DPT received by all participants was verífied, as well as the temporal relation with consultation or symptoms referred by their caregivers. Results: There was a greater probability of consulting at the emergency rooms for severe adverse reactions among children who received vaccine 1 (odds ratio (OR) =7.1; p <0.001), being greater among 4-year-old children (OR =18.9; p <0.001). Coincidentiy, in the cohort of vaccinated children, those who received vaccine 1 had a higher risk of presenting adverse reactions (RR =2.9; p <0.001), being high fever the commonest. Conclusions: We confirmed that vaccine 1 was associated to a higher risk of adverse reactions, especially among 4-year-old children. These results allowed the sanitary authority to adopt an informed decisión. The usefulness of observational studies in vaccine adverse reactions is confirmed.

Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and consistency of production of a Brazilian combined vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b

A randomized, double-blinded study evaluating the immunogenicity, safety and consistency of production of a combined diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine entirely produced in Brazil by Bio-Manguinhos and Instituto Butantan (DTP/Hib-BM) was undertaken. The reference vaccine had the same DTP vaccine but the Hib component was produced using purified materials supplied by GlaxoSmithKline (DTP/Hib-GSK), which is registered and has supplied the Brazilian National Immunization Program for over more than five years. One thousand infants were recruited for the study and received vaccinations at two, four and six months of age. With respect to immunogenicity, the vaccination protocol was followed in 95.6 percent and 98.4 percent of infants in the DTP/Hib-BM and DTP/Hib-GSK groups, respectively. For the Hib component of the study, there was 100 percent seroprotection (>0.15 µg/mL) with all three lots of DTP/Hib-BM and DTP/Hib-GSK. The geometric mean titer (GMT) was 9.3 µg/mL, 10.3 µg/mL and 10.3 µg/mL for lots 1, 2 and 3 of DTP/Hib-BM, respectively, and the GMT was 11.3 g/mL for DTP/Hib-GSK. For diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, seroprotection was 99.7 percent, 100 percent and 99.9 percent, respectively, for DTP/Hib-BM, three lots altogether and 99.2 percent, 100 percent and 100 percent for DTP/Hib-GSK. GMTs were similar across all lots and vaccines. Adverse events rates were comparable among the vaccine groups. The Brazilian DTP/Hib vaccine demonstrated an immunogenicity and reactogenicity profile similar to that of the reference vaccine.

Conduta nos contatos de doenças infecto-contagiosas / Conduct in contacts of infectious diseases

Assunto de suma importância em infectologia na conduta com contatos frente às doenças infecto-contagiosas, faz-se mister enfatizar a ação preventiva do pessoal da área de saúde e as noções ensinadas às comunidades. Algumas doenças infecciosas transmissíveis são causas importantes de morbimortalidade, principalmente ao acometerem pacientes de baixa idade e imunodeprimidos. Poderíamos citar como exemplos a varicela e a tuberculose. Atualmente, nos centros de referência para imunobiológicos especiais disponíveis em todo o terrítório nacional (www.saude.gov.br/rvs e www.saude.gov.br/bvs), são disponibilizadas vacinas especiais como varicela e imunoglobulinas como antivaricela-zóster e anti-hepatite B. A finalidade deste artigo é abordar diversas situações comuns na prática diária e qual conduta adotar com relação aos contatos, não só na comunidade como na infecção hospitalar, principalmente no caso da varicela. É importante considerar a relação das doenças com os agentes etiológicos e os periódos de incubação e de transmissão.

Subjecto of paramount importance in infectology, in front of conduct contacts with infectious diseases, it's extremely necessary to emphasize the preventive action of staff in the areas of health and the concepts taught to communities. Some infectious transmissible diseases are important causes of morbid-mortality, especially when related to young patients and immunodepressed, such as chickenpox and tuberculosis. Currently, the Center of Reference for Special Immunobiologicals available throughout the national territory (www.saude.gov.br/rvs and www.saude.gov.br/bvs), special vaccines such as varicella and anti-varicella zoster immunoglobulins and anti-hepatitis B are available. The purpose of this article is to adress various situations, common in daily practice and which conduct to adopt, regarding contacts, not only in the community and in hospital infection, especially in the case of chickenpox. It is important to consider the relationship of diseases with the etiologic agents and the periods os incubation and transmission.

Incidência de episódios hipotônicos-hiporresponsivos associados à vacina combinada DTP/Hib usada no Programa Nacional de Imunizações / Incidence of hypotonic-hyporesponsive episodes associated to the combined DTP/Hib vaccine used in Brazilian National Immunizations Program

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a segurança da vacina combinada de difteria-tétano-coqueluche de células inteiras e Haemophilus influenzae tipo b usada no Programa Nacional de Imunizações, e em especial a incidência de episódios hipotônicos-hiporresponsivos. MÉTODO: Acompanhamento de uma coorte de 21.064 lactentes (20.925 ou 99,7 por cento aderiram ao protocolo de estudo), nas 48 horas após a aplicação da vacina de difteria, tétano, coqueluche de células inteiras e Haemophilus influenzae tipo b em centros de saúde na cidade do Rio de Janeiro, para determinar e investigar eventos adversos graves, espontâneos e solicitados. Cada criança foi monitorada durante somente uma dose. RESULTADOS: A incidência de episódios hipotônicos-hiporresponsivos foi de 1:1.744 doses (casos confirmados) e de 1:1.495 doses (casos confirmados mais casos suspeitos). A taxa de incidência de convulsões foi de 1:5.231 doses. Não foram detectados casos de apnéia. Esses resultados são comparáveis àqueles relatados na literatura para a vacina contra difteria-tétano-coqueluche de células inteiras. CONCLUSÃO: A vacina contra difteria, tétano, coqueluche de células inteiras e Haemophilus influenzae tipo b em estudo pode ser usada com segurança no Programa Nacional de Imunizações, de acordo com as precauções e contra-indicações correntes.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the safety of a combined diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine used on the Brazilian National Immunizations Program, chiefly the incidence of hypotonic-hyporesponsive episodes. METHOD: Follow-up of a cohort of 21,064 infants (20,925 or 99.7 percent adhered to the study protocol), within 48 hours of vaccination with diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine in health care units in the City of Rio de Janeiro, to ascertain and investigate spontaneous and solicited severe adverse events. Each child was followed-up for one dose only. RESULTS: The rate of hypotonic-hyporesponsive episodes was 1/1,744 doses (confirmed cases) and 1/1,495 doses (confirmed plus suspect cases). The rate of convulsions was 1/5,231 doses. No cases of apnea were detected. These results are comparable to those found in the literature with diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis vaccine. CONCLUSION: The diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine under study can be safely used in the National Immunizations Program, according to the current precautions and contraindications.

Prevalence of diphtheria and tetanus antibodies and circulation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae in São Paulo, Brazil

The introduction of routine vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria in Brazil has decreased the incidence and changed the epidemiology of both diseases. We then investigated the prevalence of Corynebacterium diphtheriae carrier status and diphtheria and tetanus immunity in São Paulo, Brazil. From November 2001 to March 2003, 374 individuals were tested for the presence of C. diphtheriae in the naso-oropharynx and of serum diphtheria and tetanus antibodies. Participants were all healthy individuals without acute or chronic pathologies and they were stratified by age as follows: 0-12 months and 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-24, 25-39, 40-59, and ³60 years. Antibodies were assessed using a double-antigen ELISA. C. diphtheriae species were identified by biochemical analysis and toxigenicity was assessed by the Elek test. For diphtheria, full protection (antibodies ³0.1 IU/mL) was present in 84 percent of the individuals, 15 percent had basic protection (antibodies ³0.01 and <0.1 IU/mL) and 1 percent were susceptible (antibodies <0.01 IU/mL). Full tetanus protection (antibodies ³0.1 IU/mL) was present in 79 percent of the participants, 18 percent had basic protection (antibodies ³0.01 and <0.1 IU/mL) and 3 percent were susceptible (antibodies <0.01 IU/mL). The geometric mean of diphtheria and tetanus antibodies reached the highest values at 5-9 years and decreased until the 40-59-year age range, increasing again in individuals over 60 years. Three participants (0.8 percent) were carriers of C. diphtheriae, all non-toxigenic strains. The present results demonstrate the clear need of periodic booster for tetanus and diphtheria vaccine in adolescents and adults after primary immunization in childhood.

Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in adolescents from São Paulo, Brazil

Tetanus and diphtheria vaccines are of special concern in adolescents because boosters are necessary for adequate maintenance of protection and are often omitted. We assessed serum levels of tetanus and diphtheria antibodies in adolescents and their association with vaccination status. From May to October 2001, we evaluated the vaccination records of 208 adolescents aged 10 to 20 years in São Paulo, Brazil. Antibodies to tetanus and diphtheria were detected using double-antigen ELISA and vaccination records were analyzed according to the guidelines of the Brazilian National Immunization Program. All adolescents had received complete primary vaccinations against tetanus and diphtheria, but 23.1 percent of them had not received a booster dose in the last 10 years. All adolescents were immune to tetanus and 88.9 percent were fully protected (antibodies ³0.1 IU/mL). One individual (0.5 percent) was non-immune to diphtheria and 86 percent were fully protected against the disease. Adolescents with up-to-date vaccination records had higher antibody levels than those with not up-to-date records for tetanus (0.763 vs 0.239 IU/mL, t-test: P < 0.0001) and diphtheria (0.366 vs 0.233 IU/mL, t-test: P = 0.014). Full immunity against tetanus (antibodies ³0.1 IU/mL) was higher among individuals with up-to-date vaccination (93.1 percent) when compared to those with not up-to-date records (75 percent, Fisher's exact test: P = 0.001). All adolescents had received basic immunization in childhood and were protected against tetanus and diphtheria. However, these data indicate that more emphasis should be placed on the tetanus-diphtheria booster in order to avoid a decay in antibody levels.